
Normally I try to present a fairly positive voice on this blog no matter what I write about. But with the new Metallica album out, I have to sound off on the negative.
A few weeks ago, the NY Times had a huge cover story in their Sunday arts section about Metallica. Of course, being a long-time metal fan, and being altogether sick of reading about credit woes and failing banks, I had to read the entire thing. About halfway through the article, I felt this gnawing pain that I always feel when reading about metal in the mainstream press. The pain has always been there, like a thorn in the back of my mind, splitting me into a newer and blacker level of consciousness every time I pick up a USA Today or a NY Times and see the words ‘Heavy Metal’ in a sub-header. It’s the pain of reading something written by an asshole that has NO IDEA what the fuck he’s talking about. It’s the sheer agony of listening to drivel being offered to the world as holy writ because it’s in Times New Roman and it wouldn’t be there if it weren’t absolute gospel.
I’m talking about mainstream critics – the kind you find in the NY Times, The Village Voice, the Boston Globe, et. al. Don’t you just love how these idiots babble on for five paragraphs just to show how smart they are before they actually get to the album? I know, we’re all supposed to be impressed that they graduated from Amherst College with a 3.4. We’re supposed to be floored by the unreadable run-on sentences filled with knee-jerk postmodern theory, as if Roland Barthes himself descended from heaven to let us know that heavy metal was finally important enough to not mean anything. We’re supposed to love that, right? Well, not me. I tell you, I’d like to stick one of my size thirteen engineering boots up every editor’s ass each time he or she shuffled one of these moronic screeds into print. Fuck!!
It always goes this way: reviewer Sidney Snide starts out with the ‘heavy metal is no longer just for parking lots and trailer parks anymore’ routine. (This might or might not be preceded by two paragraphs of filler straight from the pages of Art Forum, depending on the snob-level of the periodical.) Then he saunters into a bit of an historical recounting of the band’s history pulled straight from Wikipedia. Just to show some street-cred, he compares the album to Vulgar Display of Power or something he might have heard ten years ago at a party while he was trying to pick up an undergrad anthropology major. He does a song-by-song blow, which is unnecessary, not only because he doesn’t know what he’s talking about, but because we only want to know his overall impression of the album and if we wanted particulars we’d listen to the whole fucking album ourselves. Then he trails off into some sociological cant that he’ll repeat for his next review of music he doesn’t listen to or know anything about.
Do we care about any of this? No. All we care about is whether or not the reviewer thinks the album is good, and, briefly, why. That’s all we want. And if he doesn’t know anything about the genre or respect it, he shouldn’t be reviewing it. That goes for ALL critics. There’s nothing worse than reading a review by a writer who clearly does not like or understand the genre he’s writing about. I don’t write about emo here, because I don’t like it, I don’t listen to it, and I don’t know much about it. Sounds simple, eh? Let’s call it a rule.
Do you want my review of the new Metallica Album? Do you really want it? OK, here it is. IT SUCKS. It’s a run-of-the-mill effort with Rick Rubin’s lazy imprimatur all over it. Sure, Rubin was a king-maker in the past - basically a modern day Ahmet Ertegun. We’ll never, ever forget what he did for Slayer and Anthrax, but post Red Hot Chili Peppers, Rubin really doesn’t have anything to offer the metal community anymore. They’d have been better off using someone like Erik Rutan, who I think is one of the best metal producers out there right now. On top of this, within thirty seconds, it sounded like Metallica hasn’t really listened to any metal besides themselves in the past ten years or so. There are bands that are simply light years ahead of Metallica today (there have been since the Black album), and you’d be better off listening to them. I mean, come on! How can you come off of At the Gates or Skinless and not feel like you’re listening to a souped up version of Staind when you put on Death Magnetic?!!
As always, I respect Metallica from a historical perspective. Like those of us who were floored by Whiplash the first time we heard it on a fifth generation cassette tape, I pay my respects - as required. But there are simply better musicians making better music right now, and as I work for a living and have about a half an hour a day to really listen to music, I’ll choose them. Listening to Metallica’s new album for me is the equivalent of opening the refrigerator and expecting to find a bucket of KFC that wasn’t there thirty seconds ago. That shit just ‘aint gonna happen the way I want, so the hell with it.
As far as the critics who pretend to write about metal, go back to writing about Hot Chip or Pavement from your apartment in Williamsburg, the LES, or whatever arrondissement you inhabit. We don’t need you to tell us that we’re now culturally viable (thank you so much for that), and we ESPECIALLY don’t need any half-baked sociological treatises to explain us to ourselves. We know who we are, we’ve been who we are for a very long time, and we don’t need your help. We don’t listen to metal because it’s ironic. We listen to metal because we LIKE IT. We don’t wear Slayer shirts because they’re hip. We wear Slayer shirts because we like Slayer. We’ll be here long after the next fad has come and gone and you’re scrounging for a part-time teaching gig at the local YMCA. We’re like fucking roaches. We’ll be here FOREVER. We’ve survived without your go-ahead, and we’ll continue to do so. As a matter of fact, just to keep things interesting, we’re going to make our music even more heavy and extreme, just to give you something new to grimace about. How’s that sound?
In short, go gaze at your shoelaces somewhere else. Go to a Saviours concert and meet your friends. Compare beards while you drink Stella Artois. Just get the hell out of here.
Thank God we have our own publications anyway.



2 comments:
Word. I agree. Counter-intuitive critical appropriation of metal is lame.
On the other hand, so is all this 'us' vs. 'them' talk. Who is WE? I thought metal celebrated (and reveled in the existential horror of) individuality.
In light of your criticism of metal criticism, I am curious to know what you might think about a work of anti-critical metal criticism I have written called Black Sabbath's 'Black Sabbath': A Gloss on Heavy Metal's Originary Song, which is full of theory and philosophy, but hopefully not in a way that excludes it from the category of "our own publications."
Also, have you seen John Darnielle's Master of Reality, in the 33 1/3 series by Continuum? There some metal theorizing going on in there too, in fictional form.
And in Salzburg this November, a big academic conference is taking place, with a related volume to appear later. I've appended the schedule below.
See also http://surrealdocuments.blogspot.com/ for some very smart, theory-wise metal criticism.
Cheers,
Nicola
1st Global Conference
Heavy Fundametalisms: Music, Metal and Politics
Monday 3rd November - Wednesday 5th November 2008
Salzburg, Austria
Draft Programme 1.2
Monday 3rd November
from 12.30
Registration
13.30
Welcome and Opening Words
Rob Fisher and Niall Scott
14:00
Session 1: Aesthetics and Existentialism
Chair: Niall Scott
Carmen DeAnna
Tragic Metal
Daniel Frandsen
Suicide, Booze and Loud Guitars: The Ethical Problem of Heavy Metal
Michael Nagenborg & Christian Hoffstadt
“You’re too Fuckin’ Metal for your own good” Controlled Anger and the Expression of Intensity and Authenticity in Post-modern Heavy Metal
15.30
Tea
16:00
Session 2: Religion/Spirituality
Chair: Rebecca Forrest
Natalia Motos
The Sacred Immersed in Heavy Metal
Marcus Moberg
Turn or Burn? The Peculiar Case of Christian Metal Music
Kathleen McAuley and Elizabeth Clendinning
The Call of Cthulu: Narrativity of the Cult in Metal
17.30
Notices and Announcements
17:40
Wine Reception
Tuesday 4th November
09.30 Concurrent Sessions
Session 3A: Subculture
Chair: Colin McKinnon
Ilgin Ayik
Pentagram (A.KA. Mezarkabul): Founders of Turkish Heavy Metal
Pierre Hecker
Heavy Metal in a Muslim Context: The Rise of the Turkish Metal Underground
Session 3B: History
Chair: Angelique Moreau
Simon Poole
All Tomorrows Become Yesterday: Stoner Rock’s Construction Through Nostalgic Historiography
Robert Rutland
Roots Metal: Rediscovering the Origins of Heavy Metal in Stoner Rock
10.30
Coffee
11.00 Concurrent Sessions
Session 4A: Extreme Metal in Distorted Utopias
Chair: Marcus Moberg
Sarah Chaker
Extreme Music for Extreme People(!?!) Black and Death Metal put to Test in a Comparative Empirical Study
Jeremy Wallach
Distortion-drenched Utopias: Metal and Modernity in Southeast Asia
Session 4B: Filling the Metal Void
Chair: Elizabeth Clendinning
Claudia Azevedo
Metal in Rio de Janeiro1980’s-2008: An Overview
Brian Hickam
Filling the Void: The Heavy Metal Archiving Project
12:30
Lunch
14:00
Session 5: Gender & Identity
Chair: Keith Kahn-Harris
Florian Heesch
Metal for Nordic Men? Amon Amarth’s Representations of Vikings
Rebecca Forrest
Groupies and the Construction of the Persona of the Heavy Metal Rock God
Mikael Sarelin
Masculinities within Black Metal: Heteronormativity, Protest Masculinity or Queer?
15:30
Tea
16.00
Session 6: Cultural Theory and the Music
Chair: Varpu Rentala
Scott Wilson
From Forests Unknown: Eurometal and the Audio Political Unconscious
Joseph Blessin and Dietmar Elflein
Slaying the Pulse – Rhythmic Organisation and Rhythmic Interplay within Heavy Metal
Andy Brown
The Importance of Being ‘Metal’: The Metal Music Press and Youth Identity Construction
17.30
Sessions End
Wednesday 5th November
09.30
Session 7: Race I
Chair: Joseph Russo
Laura Wiebe Taylor
Nordic Nationalisms: Black Metal takes Norway’s Everyday Racisms to the ‘Extreme’
Justin Davisson
Extreme Politics and Extreme Metal: Strange Bedfellows or Fellow Travelers?
10:30
Coffee
11:00
Session 8: Race II
Chair: Carmen DeAnna
Varpu Rantala
Black Low: Black Metal Aesthetics in Contemporary Art
Karl Spracklen
True Ayryan Black Metal: The Meaning of Leisure, Belonging and the Construction of Whiteness in Black Metal Music
Keith Kahn-Harris
How Diverse Should Metal Be? The Case of Jewish Metal.
12:30
Lunch
14:00
Session 9: Phenomenology
Chair: Scott Wilson
Nicola Masciandaro
What is This that Stands before Me?: Metal as Deixis
Joseph Russo
Nile's Primal Ritual - Induction of the Devotee
Jamerson Maurer
Fire walk with Me; or Dwelling in the Lodge of Differentiation
15:30
Tea
16:00
Session 10: Ethics/Politics
Chair: Robert Rutland
Niall Scott
Politics? nah.. Fuck Politics man! (What can we expect from metal Gods?)
Richard Floeckher
Fuck Euphemisms: How Heavy Metal Lyrics Speak the Truth About War and Oppression
17.00
Development Meeting
17.30
Conference Close
Awesome post.
I think you just about said everything that needs to be said.
I don't know if I agree with you on the Metaliica album (I haven't heard it yet and quite frankly it's not on my list of urgent priorities) but everything else you said was spot on!
Post a Comment